لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................
93 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming into the main case, it is also a nicely-established proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence within the Stricto-Sensu, implement to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion receive support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of the charge, however, that is subject matter into the procedure provided under the relevant rules and not otherwise, with the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-recognize the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings around the evidence.
Case files can also be accessed from the public access terminals while in the clerk’s office from the court where the case was filed.
To report technical problems with our Website, please contact the webmaster. The webmaster will not respond to inquiries seeking legal suggestions or specific cases. Questions regarding specific cases should be directed to your court in which the case has actually been or will be filed.
criminal revision application is dismissed. reduced towards the period of his detention in jail he has already undergone(Criminal Revision )
82 . Const. P. 6193/2016 (D.B.) Syed Musawar Shah V/S M.D CSD and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the moment Petition under Article 199 from the Constitution based around the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued towards the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement in the FIR lodged by FIA and from the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
(Interview by email, with Ahmad Rafay Alam, a leading environmental lawyer and activist in Pakistan, August twenty eighth, 2015). Furthermore, the ruling placed a notice and comment restriction on government organizations in regards to projects that could most likely pose a public risk. This case is likewise noteworthy, “because it laid down the foundations of all long run public interest litigation brought before courts for environmental protection.” To cite only one example, following this case, the Supreme Court, citing the Zia decision, found in the Salt Miners Case (decided on 12th July, 1994) that the right to have water free from pollution and contamination is usually a right to life itself.
whether when granting promotion senior employees were considered for promotion or otherwise and submit the compliance report.(Promotion)
The regulation as proven in previous court rulings; like common law, which springs from judicial decisions and tradition.
Knowledge on the accused is actually a matter being inferred from the circumstances, for it being a state of mind, is very hard to be proved otherwise.”
Apart from the rules of procedure for precedent, the burden presented to any reported judgment may possibly depend on the reputation of both the reporter and the judges.[7]
This article here delves into the intricacies with the recent amendment, accompanied by relevant case legislation, to provide an extensive understanding of its implications and sensible applications.
In addition it addresses the limitation period under Article 91 and 120 with the Limitation Act, focusing on when plaintiff to hunt cancellation. The importance of deciding application under Order VII Rule eleven CPC based solely on plaint averments in highlighted, excluding extrinsic material at this stage. Read more
The necessary analysis (called ratio decidendi), then constitutes a precedent binding on other courts; further analyses not strictly necessary into the determination in the current case are called obiter dicta, which represent persuasive authority but are certainly not technically binding. By contrast, decisions in civil legislation jurisdictions are generally shorter, referring only to statutes.[4]